--------- 参考 1 （18C原文）-----------
Offensive behaviour because of race, colour or national or ethnic origin
(1) It is unlawful for a person to do an act, otherwise than in private, if:
(a) the act is reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people; and
(b) the act is done because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of the other person or of some or all of the people in the group.
---------- 参考2（Michael的邮件） -------------
Earlier this week, the Government announced reforms which will strengthen Australia’s anti-vilification laws, enhance freedom of speech and improve the complaint-handling processes of the Australian Human Rights Commission.
The Turnbull Government values the contribution of the Australian Chinese community; one of the most successful migrant groups in our country.
Australians value freedom of speech and they recognise the enormous benefits multiculturalism has delivered to our country. We are a proud, multicultural society. These changes recognise this - they will boost the protections against hate speech based on race, whilst enhancing freedom of speech.
All Australians have the right to live free from fear of violence and racial discrimination. As a second generation migrant to this country myself, this is of particular importance to me and my family.
You can read more about this on the Prime Ministers website at the following link:
http://www.pm.gov.au/media/2017-03-21/human-rights-legislation-amendment-bill
---- 参考3（支持改革的几个案例） -----
1) 澳洲一个漫画家Bill Leak画了一幅漫画：一个警察领着一个土著熊孩子，对他的父亲说：你应该坐下来跟你儿子讲一讲责任感。孩子的父亲回答：非常正确，但是他叫什么名字？结果这个画家被澳洲人权委员会调查。
2) 昆士兰大学有一个大学生去电脑室自修，发现太满而隔壁一个小电脑室有空位，所以就走进去想占个位置，却被赶出来因为这个是土著学生专用的，该大学生非常不满就在facebook上留言：我今天被人从土著专用电脑室赶出来了，那个电脑室没有注明是土著专用，这是用隔离来反对隔离，于是他和其他2个跟帖的大学生被该校职工告向人权委员会，在委员会调解无果下该职工将大学生告上法庭，尽管大学生胜诉，但是3年审判期间花费几十万律师费是不是就是惩罚呢？
3) 悉尼Parramatta警察局前的枪杀华裔警察案件发生后，某穆斯林社团领袖说，如果你不喜欢澳洲，你可以选择离开。如果这句话从一个非穆斯林口中说出，无疑ta就触犯了18C中的offend，因为只要有穆斯林向人权委员会提出ta感到被冒犯了，人权委员会就必须立案，而且取证的责任在人权委员会，这就是容易被滥用的原因。
------- 参考4（某微信公众号截屏）-------------
------- 参考5（助理财长的回复）---------------
It is against the law to publicly vilify someone based on their race. Changing the wording of 18C to include “harass” will strengthen our racial vilification laws.
There is also state criminal and civil law in place guarding against this behaviour”
注：这些就是修改方提供的论据。我一直努力寻找反对修改一方的论据，网上没有找到，不知道有人能否提供，让大家做到兼听则明，谢谢。
